COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Legal Histories beyond the State > The Grand Dichotomies: Sovereignty, the Public/ Private Divide, and Company States
The Grand Dichotomies: Sovereignty, the Public/ Private Divide, and Company StatesAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact md718. For the paper in advance, please contact md718@cam.ac.uk Sovereignty and the modern international system are jointly shaped and constituted by two grand dichotomies: the first separates international from domestic politics, the second distinguishes public from private realms. While the first dichotomy has appropriately received much attention, the second has been neglected in IR. We respond by demonstrating how the historical emergence and evolution of the public/private divide has reconstituted the international system through an examination of hybrid actors like the Dutch and English East India Companies. These “company states” exercised quintessentially sovereign prerogatives like war-making and diplomacy, while also pioneering the institutional forms of modern private corporations. Their rise reflected a facilitative early modern ideational context, new geopolitical opportunities and pressures for extra-European expansion, and rulers’ limited direct capacities to project power over transcontinental distances. This combination of a possibilities, opportunities, and constraints prompted rulers to privilege company states as their preferred vanguards of colonial expansion. The company states’ fall primarily reflected declining legitimacy associated with sharpening conceptions of the public/private divide. This fatal loss of legitimacy occurred despite the company states’ often spectacular military and financial success. We conclude by examining how contemporary actors like Private Military Companies challenge the public/private dichotomy, and caution against a teleological reading of the modern international system which sees a strict separation between sovereign powers and private profit-seeking as an irreversible historical end-point. This talk is part of the Legal Histories beyond the State series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsType the title of a new list here Reproduction on Film 3: Making Babies West African Archaeology; Papers in Honour of Thurstan Shaw University Research Ethics Committee Events CUSEAF Synthetic BiologyOther talksInvestigation into appropriate statistical models for the analysis and visualisation of data captured in clinical trials using wearable sensors Atmospheric Retrieval Propagation of Very Low Frequency Emissions from Lightning The Mid-Twentieth Century Babyboom and the Role of Social Interaction. An Agent-Based Modelling Approach Hypergraph Saturation Irregularities Southern Africa; Northern Cape |