COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
Writing ItselfAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact ml622. http://www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/events/25043 In ‘When Things Strike Back’ Bruno Latour takes issue with the traditional narrative according to which the laboratory offers the most impartial conditions for the disinterested mastery of its objects of investigation, and tells in its place a story in which a laboratory creates the conditions in which objects are rendered ‘able to object to the utterances that we make about them’. This conference will bring together researchers with a range of disciplinary backgrounds (including literary studies, philosophy, theology, history, law) with research interests in writing of different kinds to reflect on the kinds of conditions that can allow or enable writing to make this kind of objection. How might we enable writing of different kinds to object, to demonstrate its agency, to take issue with the things that we say about it, with what it seems to say or what we want it to say? Questions that participants might like to address include: - What are the conditions of possibility of giving an account of the efficacy of writing? - What is the relationship between the materiality of writing and its particular intervention into the world? - How might we understand relationships between efficacious writing and efficacious speech? Is the efficacy of writing different from that of incantation or of performative utterances? - Are there gains or losses to thinking of any one mode of efficacious language as a model for another? And what are the consequences of these considerations for our own writing practices? - What are the effects of the bringing of writing into focus as a topic of study for our understanding of the relationship of writing to other kinds of epistemic activity? - What are the different kinds of conceptual work that can be carried out by the different concepts—among them rhetoric, poiesis, style, idiom, trope, figure, grammar, syntax, font, character, medium, form—with which we attempt to think about writing, and what might they neglect? - What do different ways of thinking about writing enable us to know, and how does this knowledge in turn inform our choices as to what and how we write? This talk is part of the CRASSH series. This talk is included in these lists:Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCavendish Physical Society Cambridge University Self-Build Society Cambridge Immunology The Politics of Economics HEP phenomenology joint Cavendish-DAMTP seminar Hitachi Cambridge LaboratoryOther talksDataFlow SuperComputing for BigData St Johns Linacre Lecture 2018: Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe FRS Neurodevelopment disorders of genetic origin – what can we learn? How to rediscover a medical secret in eighteenth-century France: the lost recipe of the Chevalier de Guiller's powder febrifuge Ethics for the working mathematician, seminar 12: Going back to the start. International Snowballing and the Multi-Sited Research of Diplomats Picturing the Heart in 2020 To be confirmed Sneks long balus Auxin and cytokinin regulation of root architecture - antagonism or synergy |