COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Qualitative Research Forum > A window on suffering: using qualitative research to study practices surrounding palliative sedation for refractory symptoms
A window on suffering: using qualitative research to study practices surrounding palliative sedation for refractory symptomsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jane Fleming. The Qualitative Research Forum is a closed group that supports qualitative studies linked to the General Practice & Primary Care Research Unit. Its occasional Open Meetings are, however, open to anyone interested in qualitative methods: ALL WELCOME. A significant minority of dying people experience refractory symptoms or extreme distress unresponsive to conventional therapies. In such circumstances, sedation may be used to decrease or remove consciousness until death occurs. This practice is described in a variety of ways, including: ‘palliative sedation’, ‘terminal sedation’, ‘continuous deep sedation until death’, ‘proportionate sedation’ or ‘palliative sedation to unconsciousness’. Surveys (relying on recall and response to fixed categories) show large unexplained variation in incidence of sedation at the end of life across countries and care settings and there are ethical concerns about the use, intentions, risks and significance of the practice in palliative care. There are also questions about how to explain international variation in the use of the practice. The UNBIASED study (UK Netherlands Belgium International Sedation Study) comprises three linked studies with separate funding sources in the UK, Belgium and the Netherlands. The aims of the study are to explore decision-making surrounding the application of continuous sedation until death in contemporary clinical practice, and to understand the experiences of clinical staff and decedents’ informal care-givers of the use of continuous sedation until death and their perceptions of its contribution to the dying process. To realize these aims, a two-phase study has been designed. The study settings include: the domestic home, hospital and expert palliative care sites. Phase 1 consists of: a) focus groups with health care staff and bereaved informal care-givers; and b) a preliminary case notes review to study the range of sedation therapy provided at the end of life to cancer patients who died within a 12 week period. Phase 2 employs qualitative methods to develop 30 patient-centred case studies in each country. To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies which seek to take a qualitative perspective on clinical decision making surrounding the use of continuous sedation until death and the only one which includes the perspectives of nurses, physicians, as well as bereaved informal care-givers. It has several potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats associated with the specific design of the study, as well as with the sensitive nature of the topic and the different frameworks for ethical review in the participating countries. This paper will address these issues, drawing particularly on experiences from the UK arm of the study, which is funded by the ESRC . Biography Jane Seymour is Head of the Sue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care at the School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, in the University of Nottingham. The Centre was formally launched on January 31st 2006 following a generous private donation to the University to enable the development of a new and comprehensive research and education programme. Centre staff hold research grants from research councils, charities and a range of other sources, and run a substantial PhD programme with both ‘home’ and international students. The Centre provides undergraduate and postgraduate opportunities to qualified and experienced staff, as well as short courses (both face to face and distance learning) with funded places for practitioners encountering issues in palliative and end of life care for the first time. Jane is a nurse and a social scientist, and has been involved in palliative care research and education since the early 1990s. Her current research interests focus on advance care planning and other aspects of end of life decision-making, palliative care for those with diseases other than cancer, and public education in end of life care. This talk is part of the Qualitative Research Forum series. This talk is included in these lists:Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsNew Era in Russian Politics: Mayoral Campaign of Alexey Navalny MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit- Chaucer Club First Intestinal Epithelial Research SymposiumOther talksPTPmesh: Data Center Network Latency Measurements Using PTP Frontiers in paediatric cancer research Annual General Meeting Quantum geometry from the quantisation of gravitational boundary modes on a null surface Active Machine Learning: From Theory to Practice Art and Migration Immigration and Freedom Sustainability of livestock production: water, welfare and woodland 'Cambridge University, Past and Present' 'Politics in Uncertain Times: What will the world look like in 2050 and how do you know? Childhood adversity and chronic disease: risks, mechanisms and resilience |