COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Violence and Conflict Graduate Workshop, Faculty of History > TBC
TBCAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Christian Schlaepfer. This talk has been canceled/deleted Fought over the shifting sands of Egypt, the barren land of the Sinai, and the rolling mountainsides of the Judean Hills, the Palestine Campaign of the First World War produced a markedly different war experience for over a half million British combatants. Despite the allure that the Palestine Campaign seemed to possess – Christian British troops engaged in, as many had labeled it, a “new Crusade” against the Ottoman Empire in the Holy Land – public attention and support for the campaign at home was initially minimal and frequently negative. Guided by the misconception that the Turk was an inferior soldier and that a satisfactory conclusion to the war could only be realized through the maximum concentration of the Empire’s resources in Europe, British politicians and the public pushed the Palestine campaign deep into the nation’s psychological background. It was not until the arrival of General Edmund Allenby in June 1917, and the capture of Jerusalem later that year that the home front started receiving regular press coverage of the Palestine Campaign. Fighting in a peripheral theatre of war with minimal press coverage, how then, did British soldiers justify their war experience and feel about their contribution to the British war effort? What was the perceptive meaning of the Western Front as a ‘different type of war’? How was the Palestine Campaign’s public profile communicated to soldiers and subsequently, what did they think the British public knew of the campaign? By separating the wartime writings of British soldiers serving in the Egyptian Expeditionary Force from postwar recollections and published diaries, a creative reconstruction of the campaign’s activeness and importance emerges. Whereas contemporary soldiers’ writing stressed an intense desire for greater home leave and stronger contact with their friends and loved ones in Britain, postwar literature focuses on the military successes of the campaign and the soldiers’ association with their ‘heroic’ leader, General Allenby. The answers to these important questions may very well come out of the sands of Palestine. This talk is part of the Violence and Conflict Graduate Workshop, Faculty of History series. This talk is included in these lists:This talk is not included in any other list Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsShowing of the Film 'STAR MEN' CBL important Collaborative research: funding available for collaborative research out of Science and Technology Funding Council areas.Other talksLARMOR LECTURE - Exoplanets, on the hunt of Universal life Strong Bonds, Affective Labour: Sexually Transmitted Infections and the Work of History Huntington´s disease and autophagy - insights from human and mouse model systems The DNA oxygenase TET1 in mammalian embryonic development and epigenetic reprogramming The cardinal points and the structure of geographical knowledge in the early twelfth century An approach to the four colour theorem via Donaldson- Floer theory 'Cryptocurrency and BLOCKCHAIN – PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE' Thermodynamics de-mystified? /Thermodynamics without Ansätze? Autumn Cactus & Succulent Show Crowding and the disruptive effect of clutter throughout the visual system The Hopkins Lecture 2018 - mTOR and Lysosomes in Growth Control |