![]() |
COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. | ![]() |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Quantitative History Seminar > Quantifying Patenting by Women in the U.S., 1845-1924
Quantifying Patenting by Women in the U.S., 1845-1924Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Aleksandra Dul. Patents do not report inventors’ gender, requiring researchers to infer the gender of inventors. To conduct these inferences, researchers must make several choices. We show how these researcher choices can affect conclusions about the role of women inventors in the U.S. from 1845 to 1924. More specifically, we compare two automated methods to determine inventor gender for the universe of U.S. patents: inferring gender from inventors’ first names and linking inventors to census data. These methods paint similar pictures about aggregate patterns of patenting by women, but often give different predictions about the gender of particular inventors. Both automated methods identify a larger number of patents by women inventors than have previously been identified in the literature. Using the gender inferred by these two methods, we study how the characteristics of patents and inventors differ by gender. Join us on Teams: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_Y2IwMWVhNzktZGMyZS00NDgzLWI2YmUtZjQ3M2UyZDAyNzNl%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2249a50445-bdfa-4b79-ade3-547b4f3986e9%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%229c3453c5-0750-4d03-b290-abe5eac4731b%22%7d This talk is part of the Quantitative History Seminar series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsFahad's Michealmas term Talks Cambridge Neuroscience Seminars How to fix-Pname Com Facebook Orca Error?Other talksChallenges for implementing zero deforestation commitments in a highly forested country: perspectives from Liberia’s palm oil sector Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models 100 years of educational trials – no significant difference? JAX-powered Bayesian anomaly detection for supernovae analysis Title TBC Title TBC |