COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Ancient Near East Seminar Series > The Social Stratification of Ur III Umma
The Social Stratification of Ur III UmmaAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Megan Hinks. https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3aBcxWCUau_BUAULkmTs6rKwGJqHeJli6lhEpjoq2CgPQ1%40thread.tacv2/1731430592156?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2249a50445-bdfa-4b79-ade3-547b4f3986e9%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22bd730654-0544-44c4-95a9-2b2e95a60438%22%7d The social stratification of the Ur III society has been debated for about a century, particularly between Soviet Marxist and Weberian and other non-Marxist scholars. This presentation utilizes a Weberian stratification model relying upon native status groups (Stände), also known as orders, and theoretical economic classes based on property. The orders were a majority of free citizens, a moderate minority of serflike UN-il2 (“menials”), and a smaller minority of enslaved people. The upper class was composed of only the wealthiest citizens, the middle class included most of the remaining citizens and the few wealthiest UN-il2, whereas the lower class consisted of the poorest citizens, the remaining UN-il2, and all enslaved people. Only citizens experienced a substantial amount of economic autonomy or freedom, and everyone in the upper and middle classes were generally stable economically. Based on this Weberian stratification model, the majority of the population was legally and economically free, whereas the Soviet Marxist scholars contended that the majority was at least economically unfree, if not also legally unfree. In order to support these assertions, this presentation focuses on datasets from the province of Umma relating to various mandatory and voluntary employment arrangements and their compensations. This talk is part of the Ancient Near East Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsBioSoc Talks Hispanic Research Seminars CCIMI short course: Quantum Computing - Theory and PracticeOther talksWhat Interests do Algorithms Serve? Is Algorithmic Colonisation Inevitable? Margarida Hermida, Topic TBA The mutations that drive cancer Exploring an unchartered route across the inner mitochondrial membrane RSC Prizewinner's Talk: Microfluidics and engineered biomembranes as enabling technologies in synthetic cell design Protein Evolution in Sequence Landscapes - From Data to Models and Back |