University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Core Seminar in Economic and Social History > Sixty Eears after Fogel’s Social Savings: Measuring the Growth Impact of Railways in the Periphery

Sixty Eears after Fogel’s Social Savings: Measuring the Growth Impact of Railways in the Periphery

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact gpap3.

Some 60 years ago Fogel (1964) started a long-lasting debate on the role of railways in US economic growth in the late 19th century, which was also a debate on the possibility of using the concept of “social saving” as a measure of the growth impact of railways in an economy. His research was followed by a large number of works that applied the same methodology to other economies, both in the industrialised core and in the periphery, while Metzer (1977) and Crafts (2004) established a clearer link between the social saving concept and an economy’s productivity growth. Based on this literature, I have used the social saving methodology to measure the contribution of railways to economic growth before 1914 in six peripheral economies, namely Argentina, Brazil, the Cape Colony, Chile, India, Mexico and Uruguay. My estimates allow identifying some of the main determinants of the differences in the economic role of railways across the periphery. More importantly, they also show the limitations of the social savings approach and the difficulties of obtaining a single meaningful measurement of the growth impact of railways for very different economies and, more generally, of providing synthetic quantitative answers to complex historical problems.

This talk is part of the Core Seminar in Economic and Social History series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2024 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity