COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Darwin College Humanities and Social Sciences Seminars > The Social Impact of Automatic Hate Speech Detection
The Social Impact of Automatic Hate Speech DetectionAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr Nanna K L Kaalund. This talk has been canceled/deleted If you have a question about this talk, please contact nklk2@cam.ac.uk or aa974@hermes.cam.ac.uk In this talk, I explore quarantining as a more ethical method for delimiting the spread of Hate Speech via online social media platforms. Currently, companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google generally respond reactively to such material: offensive messages that have already been posted are reviewed by human moderators if complaints from users are received. The offensive posts are only subsequently removed if the complaints are upheld; therefore, they still cause the recipients psychological harm. In addition, this approach has frequently been criticised for delimiting freedom of expression, since it requires the service providers to elaborate and implement censorship regimes. In the last few years, an emerging generation of automatic Hate Speech detection systems has started to offer new strategies for dealing with this particular kind of offensive online material. Anticipating the future efficacy of such systems, the present article advocates an approach to online Hate Speech detection that is analogous to the quarantining of malicious computer software. If a given post is automatically classified as being harmful in a reliable manner, then it can be temporarily quarantined, and the direct recipients can receive an alert, which protects them from the harmful content in the first instance. The quarantining framework is an example of more ethical online safety technology that can be extended to the handling of Hate Speech. Crucially, it provides flexible options for obtaining a more justifiable balance between freedom of expression and appropriate censorship. This talk is part of the Darwin College Humanities and Social Sciences Seminars series. This talk is included in these lists:This talk is not included in any other list Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsSpanish Researchers in UK (SRUK)-Cambridge Type the title of a new list here Virology SeminarsOther talksStructureNet: Hierarchical Graph Networks for 3D Shape Generation The food of Christmas past Alzheimer's disease: the history of a working title Interfacial Network Geometry The magmatic and eruptive evolution of the 1883 explosive, caldera-forming eruption of Krakatau, Indonesia Messengers: Who We Listen To, Who We Don't, And Why |