COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > SyntaxLab > On Feature Inheritance: The Nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement
On Feature Inheritance: The Nature of Agreement and Anti-AgreementAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr Theresa Biberauer. On Feature Inheritance: The Nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement Dr Hamid Ouali (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee) In recent developments of Minimalism, Chomsky (2000, 2001, 2004 and 2005) argues that agreement results from a Probe-Goal relation established between a head X and an argument YP. Chomsky proposes that subject-verb agreement is obtained upon establishing an Agree relation between T and the subject (in Spec-vP). T however is not merged bearing φ-features but inherits these φ-features from C. In light of this hypothesis, this talk examines the nature of feature inheritance and its implications for the nature of agreement and the so-called Anti-Agreement Effect (AAE) (Ouhalla 1993, 2005b) in Berber. I argue that in nonfinite clauses, the assumption that T, which presumably does not have “the properties of true tense”, is not selected by C, and therefore does not have φ-features seems to be logical since C, from which it inherits these features, was never merged. However, the assumption that in finite clauses, when C is merged, T inherits the φ-features from it is stipulative, and should in theory allow three logical possibilities: (a) C transfers the φ-features to T (DONATE), (b) C does not transfer the φ-features to T (KEEP) and© C transfers the φ-features to T but also keeps a copy (SHARE). In this talk, and building on Ouali (2006), I will show that all these theoretically viable options are empirically attested, with DONATE being the case in declaratives, KEEP being the case of local subject-extraction, and SHARE being the case in object extraction and long distance subject/objection extraction. This talk is part of the SyntaxLab series. This talk is included in these lists:Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsInfant Sorrow Cambridge Environment Cambridge Endangered Languages and Cultures GroupOther talksComputing High Resolution Health(care) Primary liver tumor organoids: a new pre-clinical model for drug sensitivity analysis Poison trials, panaceas and proof: debates about testing and testimony in early modern European medicine Social support and breastfeeding in the UK: evolutionary perspectives and implications for public health CANCELLED: The rise and fall of the Shopping Mall: dialogues on the relationship of commerce and city Disease Migration Towards a whole brain model of perceptual learning Fumarate hydratase and renal cancer: oncometabolites and beyond Single Cell Seminars (August) Active bacterial suspensions: from individual effort to team work Trees as keys, ladders, maps: a revisionist history of early systematic trees |