|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Understanding acceptability judgments: grammar or processing?
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Theodora Alexopoulou.
Linguists build theories of grammar based largely on acceptability contrasts. But these contrasts can reflect grammatical constraints and/or constraints on language processing. How can theorists determine the extent to which the acceptability of an utterance depends on functional constraints? In a series of acceptability experiments, we consider two factors that might indicate processing contributions to acceptability contrasts: (1) the way constraints combine (i.e., additively or super-additively), and (2) the way a comprehender’s working memory resources influence acceptability judgments.
Results suggest that multiple sources of processing difficulty combine to produce super-additive effects, but multiple grammatical violations do not. Furthermore, when acceptability judgments improve with higher working memory scores, this appears to be due to functional constraints. We conclude that tests of (super)-additivity and of differences in working memory can help to identify the effects of processing difficulty (due to functional constraints), but that such tests are limited in contexts of extreme processing difficulty.
This talk is part of the DTAL Tuesday Colloquia series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsStudy Group on a Langlands Correspondence for Loop Groups Information Structure Russian Graduate Seminar Group (RUSSGRADS)
Other talksBook Launch: From Tongue To Text 2017 Lord Lewis Lecture (I) Sustainable plasmonics: abundant materials for modular photocatalysis Approximate groups: nilprogressions and the structure theorem. Magnitude homology TBC Do changes in Subjective Probability Distributions reflect a Prediction Error driven learning process?