COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
Prize lecture: What do we Think we are Doing?Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Alexander Simpson. This talk has been canceled/deleted Alan will be repeating the talk he was invited to give at IEEE Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) 2017, given after receiving an award for 20-year Most Influential Paper. His 1996 paper [1] challenged the VL community to ask What do we think we are doing? It might now be called a Systematic Literature Review, although formal procedures for SLR were not developed until later. It made a textual analysis of publications in which authors described a cognitive rationale for VL research, observing that many relied on insights from folk psychology, from introspection, or speculative computer analogies to the brain. This was a study of metacognition – beliefs about one’s cognitive ability that shape the mental strategies we choose. In the case of programming language designers, the choices being shaped were not their own problem-solving strategies (something we all do), but the design rationale for new languages (which will affect others). [1] Blackwell, A.F. (1996). Metacognitive Theories of Visual Programming: What do we think we are doing? In Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 240-246.) This talk is part of the as2388's list series. This talk is included in these lists:This talk is not included in any other list Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsComputer Laboratory Research Students' Lectures 2014 India in the Global Age Darwin Society (Christ's)Other talks‘Class-work’ in the elite institutions of higher education On being a "barang": Experiences of interviewing fishermen in Cambodia and Indonesia Uncertainty Quantification of geochemical and mechanical compaction in layered sedimentary basins Childhood adversity and chronic disease: risks, mechanisms and resilience From ‘Do Not Touch’ signs to barriers: can we successfully provide access without compromising preservation principles? Computational Neuroscience Journal Club |