|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Agreement Resolution from an Optimality Theory Perspective
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Susan Rolfe.
There are two patterns of subject-predicate agreement that one observes when a subject noun phrase is comprised of conjoined noun phrases: Partial Agreement, where the predicate agrees with one of the conjuncts, typically the conjunct that is linearly closest to the predicate; and Agreement Resolution, where agreement is based on inflectional values that for person and number features reflect the derived semantic properties of the conjoined phrase and for gender (or noun class) features reflect grammatically based principles of feature selection. This talk focuses on the process of agreement resolution.
Previous accounts of resolution for gender features exemplify one of two sorts of approaches: Rule-based stipulations to handle different combinations of conjunct genders (e.g., Corbett, 1991) and Generalized operations over sets of features (e.g., feature set union: Dalrymple & Kaplan, 2000; and feature set intersection: Wechsler & Zlatic, 2003).
The former approach suffers largely from an over abundance of expressive power (allowing for a host of unattested and implausible resolution patterns), whereas the latter suffers from the opposite flaw (an inability to capture a range of interactions one frequently observes, for example, between gender and number). An approach using Optimality Theory constraint interaction, in contrast, can provide an account of cross-linguistic variation in resolution patterns that is both explanatory and descriptively adequate. Resolution patterns derive cross-linguistically from the interaction of violable markedness constraints (e.g., Fem >> Masc >> *Neut) and faithfulness constraints (e.g., constraints that impose the condition that the phrase and all its conjuncts agree in gender, or that the conjoined phrase agree on all dimensions with one of its conjuncts). The ranking of these constraints will be shown to account for the variation one observes in resolution patterns. The limited circumstances under which resolution and partial agreement interact will also be discussed.
This talk is part of the RCEAL occasional seminars series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsDigitization of History Project: Centre for History and Economics, King's College Machine Learning Summary In Situ Graduate Colloquium 2013 - Department of Architecture
Other talksEndodermal cell responses and size control regulate lateral root formation Reaping the Benefits of Partial SDN Deployment in Enterprise Networks Moving to low carbon energy provision – do we have a choice? Plan Bee: Ensuring the Future of Pollination A rigid or elastic plate floating on the free surface of a viscous film: a coupled free boundary and fluid-structure interaction problem Boundary-roughness effects in nematic liquid crystals