COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Centre of African Studies Occasional Talks > Restoring Leviathan? The Kenyan Supreme Court, Constitutional Transformation and the Presidential Election of 2013
Restoring Leviathan? The Kenyan Supreme Court, Constitutional Transformation and the Presidential Election of 2013Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Judith Weik. This paper reviews the decision of the Kenyan Supreme Court in the challenge to the Presidential Election of 4 March 2013. The Court’s reasoning in Odinga v IEBC is read against the background of the widespread violence and profound national crisis that resulted from Kenya’s previous, disputed elections in December 2007. The report of the Kriegler Commission into the 2007 electoral process recommended the creation of a special court be created to deal with election disputes and this was realized with the passage of a new constitution for Kenya in 2010. The latter was also seen by reformers as marking a broader transformation; an attempt, as Makau Mutua put it, to ‘tame Leviathan’. The petitions before the Supreme Court in 2013 were therefore widely seen as a test for the Court in relation to the resolution of disputed elections, and more broadly as a crucial moment in the early history of Kenya’s new constitutional dispensation, held out as founding a second republic, designed to vindicate the rule of law where the colonial administration and the first independent republic had notoriously failed. This review is concerned chiefly with the normative implications of the judgment and the critical issues of constitutionalism it raises, rather than with a factual assessment of the conduct of the election as such. It attends to the manner in which the Court produced and managed the boundary between politics and the law and, specifically, the nature and limits of legitimate executive power. In conclusion it can be argued that the pattern of reasoning in Odinga v IEBC reinforces rather than challenges the traditional, Hobbesian characteristics of the Kenyan state. This talk is part of the Centre of African Studies Occasional Talks series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listshumanitas ReproSoc Cambridge Product Management Network Dimer observables and Cauchy-Riemann operators Cambridge Cardiovascular Seminar Series Cambridge American History SeminarOther talksActive bacterial suspensions: from individual effort to team work Atmospheric Structure Revealed by Refraction of Routine Radio Transmissions from Civil Aircraft. HONORARY FELLOWS PRIZE LECTURE - Towards a silent aircraft Giant response of weakly driven systems Deep supervised level set method: an approach to fully automated segmentation of cardiac MR images in patients with pulmonary hypertension Adding turbulent convection to geostrophic circulation: insights into ocean heat transport Existence of Lefschetz fibrations on Stein/Weinstein domains Microtubule Modulation of Myocyte Mechanics Migration in Science DataFlow SuperComputing for BigData The Anne McLaren Lecture: CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing: Biology, Technology and Ethics Replication or exploration? Sequential design for stochastic simulation experiments |