University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > The Validity Symposia > Validity theory and validation: never the twain shall meet?

Validity theory and validation: never the twain shall meet?

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact thenetwork.

To register please contact the Network Team on 01223 553846 or thenetwork@cambridgeassessment.org.uk

The traditional, ‘pre-unified’ conception of validity at least appeared to give clear guidance on validation: if you are validating for this reason (e.g. to predict future job performance) then collect this kind of evidence (e.g. criterion-related validity evidence). Many commentators have argued that the ‘unification’ of validity theory – through the notion of construct validity – has made it far harder to understand what validation ought to comprise. Reports of a disjunction between modern validity theory and present day validation practice are increasingly common; and the ways in which people describe and characterise validity, even within the literature, are frequently equally out-of-kilter. What are we to make of this disconnection? Is it possible that modern validity theory is just too abstract, confusing or unclear to scaffold effective practice? Participants will be encouraged to examine the extent to which this may or may not be true.

This talk is part of the The Validity Symposia series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2019 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity