|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Defining Insider Trading
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ruth Rushworth.
Legal Scholars, Judges and Economists around Securities Fraud
We examine the various interpretations that legal scholars and economists have offered of insider trading since the 1950s. Fueled by the active role of the Securities and Exchange Commission, judges have had to make sense of a paragraph-long rule, promulgated in 1942. Since then, insider trading has been the battleground of fierce battles between judges and economists. Using novel scientometric methods, we document that battleground.
This talk is part of the CRASSH series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsPDN Postdoc Symposium Plenary talks Bright Club women@CL Speaker Lunch Series
Other talksDoing social research with social media: the question of participation A conceptual model of ocean heat uptake under climate change Deep consequences: Why syntax (as we know it) isn't a thing, and other (shocking?) conclusions from modelling language with neural nets Biobanking 2016 Fertility, Gender and the Family in Twentieth-Century East Africa The CSAR debate: