BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//talks.cam.ac.uk//v3//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:19700329T010000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:19701025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CATEGORIES:Darwin College Humanities and Social Sciences Semi
 nars
SUMMARY:Separating useful signals from distracting noise i
 n the climate discussion - Dr Dan Jones (British A
 ntarctic Survey)
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20140603T131000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20140603T140000
UID:TALK52148AThttp://talks.cam.ac.uk
URL:http://talks.cam.ac.uk/talk/index/52148
DESCRIPTION:Arguments from basic physics\, data analysis\, and
  climate modelling suggest that climate-­warming t
 rends over the past century are very likely due to
  human activities. Ninety‐seven percent of climate
  scientists\, and more than 18 international scien
 tific organizations\, endorse this position[1]. De
 spite this apparently clear diagnosis\, there is s
 till a considerable amount of “noise” regarding cl
 imate change in popular discussion. In this inform
 al talk\, I attempt to distinguish high quality “s
 ignal” from some of the unreliable “noise” in the 
 broad conversation about climate and climate chang
 e.\n\n[1] W. R. L. Anderegg\, “Expert Credibility 
 in Climate Change\,” _Proceedings of the National 
 Academy of Sciences_ Vol. 107 No. 27\, 12107-­1210
 9 (21 June 2010)\; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107.\n
 \nImage credit: www.cambridgeincolour.com\n
LOCATION:The Richard King Room\, Darwin College
CONTACT:Dr Katherine Bowers
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR