University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Logic and Semantics Seminar (Computer Laboratory) > Andy Pitts Says 'Type Soundness proofs are two a penny!' but I think they're cheaper than that.

Andy Pitts Says 'Type Soundness proofs are two a penny!' but I think they're cheaper than that.

Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jon Sterling .

This is a special off-schedule edition of the Logic & Semantics Seminar, with Conor Mc Bride headlining. Please note the date, time and location.

In this episode of my continuing adventures into metametatheory, I will show how to reduce type soundness (or “subject reduction”) proofs for a considerable class of dependent type theories to their sine qua non: the type correctness of the computation rules.

On the way, I’ll analyse the flow of information through typing rules, making an “input/output” distinction, and the not always coincident flow of trust, making a “citizen/subject” distinction. I’ll extract from this analysis a “pattern/expression” distinction for the formulae we write in typing rules and thus deliver a condition sufficient to push through all the structural cases of the type soundness proof. The notion of “residuation” which plays such a key role in confluence proofs will be central to this argument, also.

I’ll sketch the road map to the typechecker which checks itself!

This talk is part of the Logic and Semantics Seminar (Computer Laboratory) series.

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

Š 2006-2025 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity