![]() |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) > Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public Sphere
Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public SphereAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Yara Kyrychenko. Online comment sections, such as those on news sites or social media, can foster informal public deliberation. However, this potential is often undermined by toxic or low-quality exchanges. To combat this, platforms increasingly leverage algorithms to facilitate higher-quality discussions, e.g., by using civility classifiers or forms of prosocial ranking. Yet, these interventions may also inadvertently reduce the visibility of legitimate viewpoints, undermining a key aspect of deliberation: representation of diverse views. This paper adopts the notion of justified representation (JR) from the social choice literature and incorporates a JR constraint into algorithms for ranking comments. We find that enforcing JR leads to greater inclusion of diverse viewpoints while still being compatible with optimizing for user engagement or other measures of conversational quality. This is joint work with Smitha Milli, Tyler Lu, Jamelle Watson-Daniels and Max Nickel This talk is part of the Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCBU Monday Methods Meeting Centre for Smart Infrastructure & Construction DELETEDOther talksDirector's Briefing Semiclassical inequalities for Dirichlet and Neumann Laplacians Online Causal Inference Seminar Song in the Ancient World: Echoes of Religion and Resistance Isospectrality and Moduli Spaces On the role of the SCI hierarchy in spectral theory and PDEs — Determining uncertainty principles and the boundaries of mathematics in analysis |