Talks.cam will close on 1 July 2026, further information is available on the UIS Help Site
 

University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar > Is historical mathematics largely true?

Is historical mathematics largely true?

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Matt Farr.

(Joint work with Fabian Pregel)

Historical mathematics is widely regarded as a repository of truths. It would seem unusually sceptical to deny that, say, early Chinese, Babylonian, or Greek mathematicians established many truths about numbers and shapes, such as Pythagoras’ Theorem or instances of it for specific right-angled triangles. But is this assumption correct, and if so, what exactly justifies it?

To test the assumption, I raise and address a series of objections to it. I’ll look at two case studies in particular, both involving apparently extra-mathematical beliefs that ‘infect’, or in some way threaten the truth of, older mathematics. The first is 18th-century geometry, and the second 19th-century matricial algebra.

This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2025 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity