Do mathematical explanations impose a necessity on the natural world?
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Matt Farr.
Do some physical facts have a mathematical, as opposed to causal, explanation, and do these physical facts obtain from a degree of (mathematical) necessity stronger than that of contingent causal laws? In this talk, I focus on an influential account of mathematical explanations by Marc Lange, and argue that purported mathematical explanations are actually causal explanations in disguise. I show that such explanations are no different from ordinary applications of mathematics, as they work not by appealing to what the world must be like as a matter of mathematical necessity but by appealing to various contingent causal facts.
This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|