Talks.cam will close on 1 July 2026, further information is available on the UIS Help Site
 

University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science > When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and values

When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and values

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ahmad Elabbar.

The quality of a measurement procedure may be evaluated, among other criteria, by (i) the quality of knowledge it produces about the measurand, (ii) the relevance of its results for guiding human decision making and action, and (iii) the desirability of its impacts on individuals, society, and nature. These criteria are compatible in principle, but their application involves conflicting commitments regarding the aims and methods of measurement. I call these distinct sets of commitments ‘modes of measurement quality evaluation’, and show that value trade-offs are insufficient to reconcile them. I illustrate these claims using examples from the contemporary measurement of time and mental health.

This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2025 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity