COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Violence and Conflict Graduate Workshop, Faculty of History > The Public Politics of America's First Missile Defence System, 1967-1969
The Public Politics of America's First Missile Defence System, 1967-1969Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ilya Berkovich. The signature of the ABM Treaty in May 1972 was a significant moment, both in the development of detente between the United States and the Soviet Union and the history of nuclear arms control. Yet the United States’ policy towards missile defence before the ABM Treaty has received little attention from scholars. My PhD thesis traces the evolution of missile defence from a broad concept in 1955 through to a working deployment programme in the mid-1960s and a diplomatic bargaining chip in the early 1970s. This paper addresses a key phase of this evolution: the passionate and highly contested public debate surrounding deployment of America’s first ABM system. For the first time, foreign and defence policy elites of equal weight and standing disagreed openly over the wisdom of a major strategic nuclear weapons system, with many prominent scientists and intellectuals testifying against ABM in Congress. This divergence was in part driven by differing interpretations of the war in Vietnam. The war was also a component in rising popular participation on the ABM question, with suburban pressure groups objecting to the siting of the system near their homes and speaking out against Federal spending priorities that many felt privileged defence to the detriment of social programmes. The ABM debate culminated with a 50-51 vote in the Senate on appropriations for its deployment in August 1969, the closest vote in Congress on a defence issue since the extension of the draft in 1941. This was indicative of the resurgence of Congress as a counterpoint to the executive on questions of national security. In the process, the US ABM programme became highly politicised, facilitating its transition to a diplomatic tool in the SALT talks, which commenced in November 1969. This talk is part of the Violence and Conflict Graduate Workshop, Faculty of History series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsType the title of a new list here CMIH Imaging Clinic Odd perfect numbersOther talksMigration in Science Sustainability 101: how to frame it, change it and steer it A passion for pottery: a photographer’s dream job Constructing datasets for multi-hop reading comprehension across documents Current-Induced Stresses in Ceramic Lithium-Ion Conductors Smuts, bunts and ergots Coatable photovoltaics (Title t o be confirmed) Black and British Migration Sustainability of livestock production: water, welfare and woodland A new proposal for the mechanism of protein translocation Microtubule Modulation of Myocyte Mechanics The homelands of the plague: Soviet disease ecology in Central Asia, 1920s–1950s |