| COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. | ![]() |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science > When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and values
When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and valuesAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ahmad Elabbar. The quality of a measurement procedure may be evaluated, among other criteria, by (i) the quality of knowledge it produces about the measurand, (ii) the relevance of its results for guiding human decision making and action, and (iii) the desirability of its impacts on individuals, society, and nature. These criteria are compatible in principle, but their application involves conflicting commitments regarding the aims and methods of measurement. I call these distinct sets of commitments ‘modes of measurement quality evaluation’, and show that value trade-offs are insufficient to reconcile them. I illustrate these claims using examples from the contemporary measurement of time and mental health. This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsERC Equipoise Neuroscience Environment on the EdgeOther talksWar and Prices: Austerity and the Cost of Living Index in Britain (c. 1939-1950) Where You Live Matters: Host Galaxy Insights into Transient Progenitors 100 years of SETI: what has been learned? An Open System Approach to Cosmology Film Screening: Plan Z - From Lab Coats to Handcuffs DME: Medicine for the Elderly CPC |