A Proposal on Evaluation Measures for RTE
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Laura Rimell.
We outline problems with the interpretation of accuracy in the presence of bias, arguing that the issue is a particularly pressing concern for RTE evaluation. Furthermore, we argue that average precision scores are unsuitable for RTE , and should not be reported. We advocate mutual information as a new evaluation measure that should be reported in addition to accuracy and confidence-weighted score.
This talk is part of the NLIP Seminar Series series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|